That headline is not a joke folks. By now everyone should be well acquainted with the term “disparate impact”, and how it’s being used. This border fence application is just another example of the irrational logic within the legal argument of “disparate impact”.
In essence the fence is unlawful because:
A fence constructed to secure the Southern U.S. border would result in more Hispanics being impeded or blocked, as a percentage of all illegal border crossers, than non-Hispanics. Therefore the fence has a disparate impact on Hispanics and it’s use is illegal.
FEDERAL RULING – A Homeland Security initiative to put fencing along the U.S.-Mexico border could discriminate against minorities, according to an Obama-appointed federal judge who’s ruled that the congressionally-approved project may have a “disparate impact on lower-income minority communities.”
This of course means that protecting the porous—and increasingly violent—southern border is politically incorrect. At least that’s what the public college professor at the center of the case is working to prove and this month she got help from a sympathetic federal judge. (more…)
Posted in A New America,
Anti-White Intifada,
BGI - Black Grievance Industry,
CRS,
Dept Of Justice,
Illegal Aliens,
Mexico,
Operation Brown Dream,
Political correctness/cultural marxism,
propaganda,
Racism,
Typical Prog Behavior,
Uncategorized