James O’Keefe puts together a research video on Al Sharpton from the perspective of those inside the families he claims to advocate for. The overall video is ok, but in my opinion James has spotlighted the wrong genre in the professional Black Grievance Industry. (more after video)

(Via Project Veritas) Here’s our new video showing how the families and attorneys of Eric Garner, Trayvon Martin, and Michael Brown really feel about Rev. Al Sharpton. Additionally, local clergy and others express their opinions about how Sharpton exploits tragedy for personal gain.

Having been deep inside the investigative angle of the professional BGI for multiple years I think O’Keefe missed the explosive aspect to the BGI exploits.

Unfortunately, what will come as a consequence of this video is a racially driven circling of the wagons around Sharpton along the line of: “my brothers keeper” type of sentiment.  A race-based code of Omerta.

There are indeed intense aspects of the BGI which deserve sunlight. However, in my humble opinion they no longer relate directly to Rev. Al Sharpton.

There’s an entire new generation of BGI structure that is much more dangerous than the Sharpton world of days gone by. Within the new genre a network of interconnected and synergetic enterprises structurally align to form a very specific, and very dangerous, system.

Sharpton is part of that system, but an increasingly less significant part. The newer social-justice model is a reflection of a far more harsh network of affiliates. It takes a long time to understand the network(s) and how they communicate; but when you do understand it just about everything they do becomes far more predictable.

The modern BGI is like a linear corporation with massive divisions. Political networks, social media networks, pop culture networks, church networks, legal and financial networks, each acting like corporate divisions.

Each network is independent yet responsible for, and communicative toward, a revenue stream benefiting the larger BGI ideological goal.

Once you understand the networks, then you can understand the role -within the network- that each participant plays.

In my opinion, this “expose'” by Project Veritas gives too much credence and weight to Al Sharpton’s network. Sharpton, like the NAACP, represents a very small and aging portion of the overall construct.

His division is outdated, his role is now viewed as a figurehead; accepted and honored due to his previous efforts at building the foundation for the modern and professional BGI.  But that’s where it stops.