All day long the pundits and talking heads on all the major networks have been talking about this unprecedented media push by President Obama. Almost all of them proclaiming amazement about President Obama talking to “Six” count them, S.I.X, TV broadcasters.
Well, it’s not quite what the White House would have you believe…..

I think the media got out foxed by the White House — each gets 7 minutes? That is really nuts. You can’t get information about an important issue like war in 7 minutes. If the President gives a long answer to the first question, you are cooked…time is up!
What the media should have done is asked to have the time combined – 42 minutes – and then pick out of a hat who did the interview from this group of 6 and let ALL NETWORKS use the interview like a pool interview. (Via Gretawire)
UPDATE(s) – As predicted earlier today: Harry Reid has cancelled Senate vote authorizing President Obama to take military action. AND President Obama backs off Red Line and says he’s open to “diplomatic tack”.
The reasons WHY are evidenced as they were previously outlined below:

After 10 straight days of pressure from President Obama’s team, the request for congressional authorization is failing miserably. All intellectually honest DC operatives, pundits et al, are all in agreement any vote in House of Representatives would fail horridly, and passage in the Senate is doubtful at best.
President Obama will not allow a vote call upon either chamber that he knows would fail. [Unless, of course, the vote failure was to his benefit – that’s not the case on this Syrian authorization]. Harry Reid will not call a vote in the Senate which would embarrass or humiliate President Obama.
That said, now the issue becomes how to get President Obama out from his self inflicted plunge under his own bus. This phrase, which will eventually come from the mouth of Obama, is what all political efforts are working toward:
“I was never for militarily attacking Syria, I always wanted a peaceful solution”.
Obama needs to position himself as being reluctantly dragged toward conflict now. He needs to make the case that *HE* did not want to attack Syria, the global demands of humanity were forcing him to threaten Assad.
President Obama needs a soft landing to save face – to find a soft landing you need to receive a ‘soft message’ from your adversary. Russia knows this.
Russia and Syria know there is no popular support for Obama. Russia knows from decades of experience inside the U.S. exactly what the internal public opinion does to any administration; and most importantly Russia knows what is described above as to what POTUS protectors are doing to safety net President Obama. Hence…. (more…)

(Via GWP) JihadWatch reports the following:
Confirmation from the White House itself that John Kerry was lying when he said that the number of countries supporting the U.S. had reached “double digits.” “White House Admits It’s a Coalition of One,” by Patrick Brennan at National Review, September 8:
When asked this morning if the U.S. has any pledges of military support for strikes in Syria, White House chief of staff Denis McDonough emphasized that the G20 and other nations have made supportive condemnations of the Syrian government’s actions, but repeatedly pressed by CNN’s Candy Crowley, provided no examples of countries that have endorsed or will provide personnel or equipment for a military intervention.

*Updated Congressional Vote Counts* You can see how your congressional House and Senate representatives are planning to vote:
Via ABC News Congressional Whip Polling:
OPPOSE MILITARY ACTION IN SYRIA: 75
LIKELY TO OPPOSE: 150 Total Oppose 225
SUPPORT MILITARY ACTION IN SYRIA: 19
LIKELY TO SUPPORT: 25 Total Support 44
UNDECIDED: 140
UNKNOWN: 23 Total Undecided 163 (link)
The Huffington Post/Think Progress Polling: (more…)
Or as John McCain would say “Allahu Akbar” !!
In return Pope Francis rebukes President Obama !!
With all my strength, I ask each party in the conflict not to close themselves in solely on their own interests. #prayforpeace
— Pope Francis (@Pontifex) September 5, 2013
Via Shadi Hamid, is the Director of Research at the Brookings Institute’s Doha Center:
Newspaper also claims that son of MB leader threatened Obama w- release of "papers" revealing his MB membership: https://t.co/x4lV2JdS91
— Shadi Hamid (@shadihamid) September 1, 2013
If you missed it, "liberal" Egyptian newspaper has front page headline claiming Obama as full-on member of Muslim Brotherhood international.
— Shadi Hamid (@shadihamid) September 1, 2013
In related news – the Eyptian interim government is reconsidering going back to the ban on the Muslim Brotherhood due to their entrenched terrorism. It should not be forgotten the Brotherhood killed former Egyptian President Anwar Sadat which was the final straw the last time they were an allowed political entity.

I think it is prudent to go back to June 2011 and remind everyone that President Obama took us to war in Libya without congress. He even stayed in the conflict after his own Office Of Legal Counsel advised him he was violating constitutional law:
(June 2011 – New York Times) President Obama rejected the views of top lawyers at the Pentagon and the Justice Department when he decided that he had the legal authority to continue American military participation in the air war in Libya without Congressional authorization, according to officials familiar with internal administration deliberations. (link)
(Via Politico) Secretary of State John Kerry on Sunday said if the Assad regime in Syria “were to be foolish enough to attack yet again and to do something in the meantime,” President Barack Obama “knows he has the power” to attack unilaterally and would likely “move very, very rapidly” — but “he feels we are stronger” moving with congressional authorization. (more…)
All About Politics – All About Optics – All The Time
Every single move our President takes is determined by political winds…..
Wow. Just wow. The speech by President Obama this afternoon was just staggeringly unreal. Bizzarro World Type pretzel contortions. The speech was short, but in a surprising twist Obama announced he will seek congressional authority on attacking Syria even though he believes he has the authority to go ahead with strike. (this really is must watch stuff – even if you find yourself challenged to stick with it through the absurd nature of what you are bearing witness to)
Following the speech Charles Krauthammer accurately captured several optical realities.
(more…)
….The issue at the time was American Independence, 230+ years ago.

More on the historical context HERE
Having watched a media cycle it’s obvious. President Obama is going to strike Syria; Alone.
Imagine if George W Bush refused to consult congress, garner congressional (ie. the peoples’) support, proceeded without U.N. mandate, defied the U.N. Security Council, ignored the entire international community and also failed to secure any allied backing prior to attacking another nation.
Think about it?
Seriously. Given the history of the U.S. media and military conflict – Think about it?
Our ally, “The” #1 Ally, America’s strongest EVER -in the history of EVER- ally, Great Britain says: “meh, nah, you’re on your own with this one mate“… ENGLAND? Bloody Hell?…. we can’t even get them?
This Presidential hypocrisy is larger than all other familiar, and frequent, hypocrisies yet from this leftist administration; and that is saying a lot – because there have been a bunch of them. This one however, is so blazingly incredulous, the light from where incredulous hides would not reach this example for a lifetime. (more…)