State Department Spokesperson Marie Harf attempts to defend Hillary Clinton’s exclusive use of personal email account to conduct Official State Department Business”. According to media reports, and Hillary Clinton’s own confirmations, she NEVER used the official government communication account.
Here’s the video:
Here’s the issues. (more…)
Why do gay rights advocates have to do these stunts? Not only are these ridiculous stunts nonsense, they are actually dangerous and pull law enforcement officers/officials away from other events which can have horrific consequences.
Moonbattery actually tracks these as “Hate Hoaxes” and the list is ridiculously long – See Here
In this latest stunt an Ohio gay rights activist, Adam Hoover, clams on Facebook that he has been kidnapped and is locked in the trunk of his car. He pleads with the audience for assistance: (more…)
To prove the Netanyahu speech was political, the Democrats pull a political stunt and boycotted the speech. However, their ignorance doesn’t stop them from quickly joining in apoplectic fits to ridicule the delivery of the message.
Nancy Pelosi grabs her pearls, steadies her shaking sensibilities, and opines she was in tears, TEARS, as she listened to the outline of how dangerous it would be for Iran to gain nuclear weapon capability. Not tears of worry for Israel, but rather tears that Dear Leader Obama’s claim to the contrary is being undermined:
[…] That is why, as one who values the U.S. – Israel relationship, and loves Israel, I was near tears throughout the Prime Minister’s speech – saddened by the insult to the intelligence of the United States as part of the P5 +1 nations, and saddened by the condescension toward our knowledge of the threat posed by Iran and our broader commitment to preventing nuclear proliferation. (link)
Nancy Pelosi and the entire contingent of the Congressional Black Caucus ran out of the chamber as soon as Prime Minister Netanyahu was finished delivering his speech. (more…)
The insufferable GOP had better knock off using the Clinton email controversy to attack. If the GOP is not careful the substance of the Hillary manipulation and deception will be lost amid the MSM talking points of the controversy merely being a Republican partisan attack.
Framing her defense that way has already protected her Benghazi Scandal from the sunlight of congressional inquiry, and more importantly a public understanding the issues at hand.
A far better approach would be simple questions to people like John “Skippy” Podesta, Admiral Mullen and the ARB authors, about how long they have known that Secretary Clinton was using a personal email account to conduct official U.S. State Dept business.
Get them all on record, then follow-up with a blistering series of “why” questions.
UPDATE: Here’s Video of the full speech:
First, it should be recognized that Team Hillary is trying to hide this explosive revelation in the media cycle of the wildly covered Benjamin Netanyahu speech.
Accepting the timing of the story, if you needed further confirmation of how horridly corrupt the Machiavellian schemes are within Team Clinton, well, this latest story represents the “cherry” on the cake.
Remember too, this current revelation must be kept in perspective because it comes on the heels of some other rather conspicuous previous sunlight encumbrances. Namely the November 2012 Thanksgiving holiday when a mysterious fire took place in the State Department DC office building. Well, actually directly above her exact office – cause undetermined.
A “fire” which preceded an unfortunate slip and fall for the Secretary, resulting in a concussion, which led to the discovery of a blood clot, that ultimately delayed her congressional testimony before a Senate Hearing into the events of Benghazi two months earlier.
And this latest revelation must also keep in mind an internal State Department Accountability Review Board report where they never actually interviewed Hillary but said they reviewed “all pertinent documents”. Did those ARB investigators even know about her personal email? I digress…. (more…)
Everyone following the political dynamics of this administration knows their ‘poker tell’, it’s brutally obvious.
This administration shows their fear with the sheer rabidity of what they proclaim not to be doing.
Today the White House, and every single senior official, is publically shouting about President Obama NOT going to watch the Benjamin Netanyahu speech to congress. A brutally transparent falsehood identified easily by the scope of the public protestations therein.
In order to fully understand what is at stake one only needs to accept the empirical reality that “control is a reaction to fear”. The absence of control breeds a fear that reaches fevered pitches when the causation is about to take stage. This is the sentiment echoing through the halls of the marbled executive branch and the offices at Foggy Bottom tonight as the professional political class try and cope with their fear.
But if control is the reaction to fear, and the lack of control stimulates a frenzied fear response, then what exactly is it that Team Obama fear so openly? As highlighted within this CNN presentation the answers are brutally obvious: (more…)
Earlier today Samantha Power was designated to play the role of ‘good cop’, and make the case, albeit difficult given her life’s work to undermine Israel, that President Obama and the current U.S. administration support Israel.
However, later this evening Susan Rice was designated to play the role of ‘bad cop’, and tell the AIPAC audience that despite their desires and wishes the Obama administration is going to allow Iran to have nuclear capabilities.
As part of her attempt to explain, Rice stated:
“I know some of you would be urging congress to insist that Iran forgo it’s domestic enrichment capacity, entirely”
AWKWARD – the audience then erupts in uncomfortable applause to express their affirmation of that principle – yes, exactly!
Yet, Rice had to deliver the bad news….. in the opinion of her boss, President Obama, “it is not achievable” !
The awkwardness continues as Susan Rice says: (more…)
Last week Secretary John Kerry said no-one should trust anyone else’s opinion on the Iranian deal/negotiations because no-one knows the specifics.
However, if that’s accurate, then why is Kerry/Obama claiming today they are concerned about “leaks” and worried about what Benjamin Netanyahu may, or may not, say tomorrow?
An article today highlights the Obama administration’s decision to cut Israel out of the information pipeline due to the possibility that Israel would expose the details of any intelligence information.
This is a ridiculous U.S. assertion for multiple reasons; not the least of which is A.) Israel has far more accurate intelligence regarding Iran, and, B.) Israel would be the recipient of any adverse consequence from such a security compromise.
What President Obama and Secretary Kerry are more likely concerned with is Netanyahu exposing a reality that Obama and Kerry are hiding information and misleading congress. (more…)
The transparency of the Democrat’s big picture targeting is brutally obvious. It has long been rumored that former Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley might just be the greatest threat to a Hillary Clinton bid for the 2016 Democrat presidential nomination.
Why,… it was just yesterday the New York Times highlighted O’Malley’s progressive bona fides, and a veiled shot at Dame Hillary.
[NYT] Martin O’Malley, the former Maryland governor who is likely to seek the Democratic nomination for president in 2016, took a veiled shot at a potential rival, Hillary Rodham Clinton, in a speech in South Carolina on Saturday, criticizing the politics of “triangulation” that have historically been associated with the Clintons.
“The most fundamental power of our party and our country is the power of our moral principles,” Mr. O’Malley said, according to a transcript of his remarks provided by an aide.
[…] “Triangulation is not a strategy that will move America forward. History celebrates profiles in courage, not profiles in convenience.” (link)
Then today, something politically surreptitious happened which might just change the angle of O’Malley’s approach: (more…)