In a staggering, but not unexpected, display of judicial bias Judge Nelson has ruled against George Zimmerman’s defense,… again. Denying George Zimmerman the right to depose Trayvon Martin family attorney, Benjamin Crump, about his involvement with all issues surrounding Witness #8, “DeeDee”: (more…)
Here is the full video of Robert Zimmerman’s interview on Piers Morgan. As you watch the video, remember the progressive approach to controlled narrative. Isolate – Ridicule – Marginalize
- As expected Morgan used the Mark O’Mara interview to isolate Robert Zimmerman Jr.
- Morgan skillfully then ridiculed him using Zimmerman’s own apology to verbally beat him up.
- Then Morgan marginalized Zimmerman by framing the previous controversial tweet as racist.
Isolate – Ridicule – Marginalize. It is the approach always taken. (more…)
Not content to telling Black Entertainment Television that “the stand your ground law is an absurd statute“…… And not content in telling CNN “my client believes he is not a racist“…… Mark O’Mara cues up the following talking point:
…”according to your brother’s attorney you are not helping him (insert quote here)”…
Yep, showing a profound proclivity for stupidity and simultaneously his own progressive intellect, Mark O’Mara tries to thread the PC needle while riding the rabid version of the BGI tiger, by whipping up a conversation with, wait for it, yep….. THE DAILY BEAST. A most profoundly and insufferably left-wing progressive mouthpiece for the Grievance Industry.
WHY? To discuss, the agenda laden “Robert Zimmerman Jr is a racist” meme advocated by the progressive frontman Winston Ross who is writing his agenda driven narrative:

George Zimmerman Lawyer Calls Brother’s Racist Tirade ‘Inappropriate’
Mar 27, 2013 4:45 AM EDT
A stream of racist tweets comparing Trayvon Martin to alleged baby killer De’Marquise Elkins? Robert Zimmerman Jr. is doing his brother no favors, George’s lawyer tells Winston Ross. (more…)
George Zimmerman’s defense team [ both of them 😉 ] filed a reply to Benjamin Crump’s response regarding deposition. (pdf available here) Essentially outlining the initial claims in the first motion for reconsideration – with clarification that ‘protected work product’ inquiry is a standard that cannot be met in advance of the question(s) being asked.
Still no word on why the Judge delayed the next hearing, or how the Orlando Sentinel (Rene Stutzman) became aware of the postponement. (more…)
On March 18th George Zimmerman attorney, Mark O’Mara, filed a motion for judicial reconsideration regarding a prior ruling stopping Trayvon Martin family attorney, Benjamin Crump from being deposed.
There were/are multiple substantive arguments in the motion filed by O’Mara outlining the defense position that Benjamin Crump, is specifically a key witness for deposition surrounding all of the elements regarding discovery of Witness #8, Dee Dee. Additionally the motion draws attention to misleading statements, false representations to the court, and false claims by Crump to the media and defense. (review here)
Today Benjamin Crump, through his counsel, Bruce Blackwell, responded: (more…)
[Excerpt From Orlando Sentinel] … for the second time in as many days, defense attorneys asked Circuit Judge Debra S. Nelson to sanction prosecutors, accusing them of another rule violation. [pdf available here]
This time was a fight over whether to video record the deposition of the state’s most important witness, a young Miami woman who was on the phone with Trayvon moments before he was shot.
Her deposition was scheduled for 9 a.m. March 13 at a state office in Miami, and the parties were in place, along with a camera and operator, according to new paperwork filed by defense attorney Mark O’Mara, but Assistant State Attorney Bernie de la Rionda said no to the video recording.
That happened after defense attorneys had sent two deposition notices to the state, [The first on March 6th, the second on March 11th] spelling out that the session would be videotaped and identifying the company that would do the recording. (more…)
A while ago, around the time we were contemplating “Password Protected Posts for ongoing research sharing”, and during an email exchange with DiwataMan, he posed the question: (paraphrased)
“how do you know the integrity of the person you may or may not give the password to – that they would not divulge sensitive information“?
Indeed, it has been a challenge to discover the “intents” of many people following this case – because, as you are probably aware, many of the Scheme Team players embedded into the Treehouse commenting community. They hid their agenda and operated a psy-ops campaign to discover information, that information was then transmitted to the prosecution team, the BGI and the concentric circles around the DOJ. (more…)
Today in the State of Florida VS. George Zimmerman case (Trayvon Martin shooting) the defense counsel Mark O’Mara has provided the court with a motion to Sanction the Prosecutorial Team [The State of Florida]. pdf available here
Specifically O’Mara is outlining to the court how Witness #8, “DeeDee”, Trayvon’s reported girlfriend, had lied in her sworn statements and how the State of Florida, Bernie De La Rionda, had known about her lies since August 2nd 2012, and yet never divulged that factual knowledge to the court or defense team in discovery.
O’Mara is asking for punitive sanctions, fines and legal reimbursement, against the State of Florida for their complicit and intentional hiding of pertinent discovery.
The motion cites the specific examples of how the lies were created, why the lies were told, and how the State of Florida was told about the lying by the witness herself. (more…)
We are currently awaiting some very substantive, researched, background and proprietary information, regarding the events which surround the shooting of Trayvon Martin by George Zimmerman.
However, in advance of the information it is perhaps important to revisit the substance of our position from the outset of initial interest in this case; And, more importantly, discuss two specific principles which have caused some readers to erroneously reconcile information gleaned from the spotlight of our research: Projection and Transference:
Projection – where a person subconsciously denies his or her own negative attributes by ascribing them to objects or persons in the outside world instead; or a person affirms their own positive attributes by ascribing positive intent toward the behavior of another.
Thus, projection involves projecting faults or attributes of altruism onto others.
Projection can also be established as a means of justifying a person bearing witness to certain actions that would normally be considered intolerable.
This often means projecting false altruism toward an individual for the sole purpose of maintaining a self-created illusion.
One of the many problems with this process whereby ‘something dangerous that is observed can be justified’, or shifted, from actual expressed intent into a false belief of assigned honesty – ergo a process of “projection”‘ – Danger lies in the approach because as a result the projector may become somewhat cognitively depleted and rendered limp in objectivity. (more…)
Numerous people are only just now becoming aware of the lucrative industry of “grievance”. Despite the growth of income potential from grievance industrialists over the course of many years, most people never really paid attention to it. The Zimmerman case brings an opportunity to deliver sunlight to the scheme(s).

George Zimmerman is, on paper, being prosecuted by the State of Florida, but the state is not really his prosecution – The State is merely facilitating a process created by, structured by, and afforded by the Grievance Industry.
As we have previously outlined Angela Corey was chosen by Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi because Corey needed some quick credibility with the African-American constituency. Corey was one of the Campaign Managers for Bondi – so the relationship is quite sympatico.
Bondi was the prosecutor in another previously successful Grievance Campaign against the State, “The Martin Lee Anderson case“. In the Anderson case, Trayvon Martin family attorney, Benjamin Crump, was also the lead civil representative for wrongful death claims by Anderson’s family. In that case Pam Bondi and Benjamin Crump also cemented their friendship and quid-pro-quo arrangements. Crump was out for money, Bondi needed political clout. (more…)










