Originally Posted March 5th – 2013

Originally posted March 5th upon finding out Witness 8 was never hospitalized:

ORLANDO – […] Attorneys for George Zimmerman were expected to ask his judge this morning to order the state’s most important witness, the young Miami woman who was on the phone with Trayvon Martin just before he was shot, to produce medical records.

However, defense lawyer Don West made a startling claim shortly after the hearing began: The state had revealed, before the hearing, that there are no medical records.

Don West

The woman, the defense lawyer said, “misrepresented” in a sworn statement that she missed Trayvon’s funeral because she had been hospitalized.

“In fact, she lied,” West said.

Prosecutor John Guy confirmed there will be no medical records, effectively confirming that there was no hospital trip. (more…)

Benjamin Crump and Subornation of Perjury – The “Horse Shedding” Of Witness #8 (Repost with full prior comments)

Natalie Jackson and Benjamin Crump
Natalie Jackson and Benjamin Crump

Trayvon Martin family attorney, Benjamin Crump, is both an attorney for the Martin family, and simultaneously an identified, albeit unlisted, material witness in the case against George Zimmerman.

Crump is a material witness because of his specific and intentional engagement of Witness #8, Dee Dee, and her subsequent presentation to the State of Florida.

Benjamin Crump has also been assigned special status, as co-counsel of sorts, for the prosecution, by Florida Judge Nelson when she ruled he was not subject to deposition by the defense.

Subornation of Perjury – In American law and in Scots law the subornation of perjury is the crime of persuading a person to commit perjury — the swearing of a false oath to tell the truth in a legal proceeding, be it spoken or written. The term subornation of perjury further describes the circumstance wherein an attorney at law causes a client to lie, or allows another party to lie, under oath.

In legal practice, the condition of suborning perjury applies to a lawyer who presents either testimony or an affidavit, or both, either to a judge or to a jury, which the attorney knows to be materially false, and not factual.

In civil law and in criminal law, the attorney’s knowledge that the testimony is materially false must rise above mere suspicion to what an attorney would reasonably have believed in the circumstances of the matter discussed in the testimony. Hence, the attorney cannot be wilfully blind to the fact that his or her witness is giving false, perjurious testimony.

Moreover, an attorney who actively encourages a witness to give false testimony is suborning perjury, which is a crime punished either with formal disciplinary action, disbarment, or jail, or a combination thereof.

Likewise, a false statement by an attorney in court also is a crime similar to subornation of perjury, and is punished accordingly. Hence, in the professional conduct of an attorney at law, there is a fine delineation between assisting a witness to recall occurred events and encouraging him or her to give materially false testimony. (more…)

Thread 5 – Day 13 (Week #3) Zimmerman Trial – Witness Discussion Thread

zimmerman-trial-049-062513zimmerman-trial-016-062513

Today, June 26th, is DAY #13 (of 3rd week) State of Florida V. George Zimmerman case. An explosive second day of deconstructed witness testimony took place yesterday. Which leads to the “big question”: Will witness #8, Rachel Jeantel, be called to the stand today? (more…)

Thread 4 – Day 13 (Week #3) Zimmerman Trial – Witness Discussion Thread…

zimmerman-trial-049-062513zimmerman-trial-016-062513

Today, June 26th, is DAY #13 (of 3rd week) State of Florida V. George Zimmerman case. An explosive second day of deconstructed witness testimony took place yesterday. Which leads to the “big question”: Will witness #8, Rachel Jeantel, be called to the stand today? (more…)

Thread 3 – Day 13 (Week #3) Zimmerman Trial – Witness Discussion Thread…

zimmerman-trial-049-062513zimmerman-trial-016-062513

Today, June 26th, is DAY #13 (of 3rd week) State of Florida V. George Zimmerman case. An explosive second day of deconstructed witness testimony took place yesterday. Which leads to the “big question”: Will witness #8, Rachel Jeantel, be called to the stand today? (more…)

Thread 2 – Day 13 (Week #3) Zimmerman Trial – Witness Discussion Thread…

zimmerman-trial-049-062513zimmerman-trial-016-062513

Today, June 26th, is DAY #13 (of 3rd week) State of Florida V. George Zimmerman case. An explosive second day of deconstructed witness testimony took place yesterday. Which leads to the “big question”: Will witness #8, Rachel Jeantel, be called to the stand today? (more…)

Day 13 (Week #3) Zimmerman Trial – Witness Discussion Thread…

zimmerman-trial-049-062513zimmerman-trial-016-062513

Today, June 26th, is DAY #13 (of 3rd week) State of Florida V. George Zimmerman case. An explosive second day of deconstructed witness testimony took place yesterday.  Which leads to the “big question”:  Will witness #8, Rachel Jeantel, be called to the stand today? (more…)

How Bad Was The Initial Media Lying?….. Beyond Insufferable

Again, this is 4 and 1/2 minutes of your life you can never get back – But it helps to understand just how ridiculously biased the media was at the beginning of the entire fiasco. This audio/video was the example, the origin which followed our conversations with Ryan Julison, where Ytz4Me and myself decided to take on Matt Gutman specifically.

There have been many media journalists who have malpracticed with this case. But if you had to pick the top three I think Matt Gutman would be on everyone’s list. His reporting ran on ABC news morning, noon, and night – and was picked up by ABC online print broadcasting. After listening to this you can understand why Ryan Julison and the Scheme Team picked him for so many exclusives. Including taking him along to Mayor Tripletts office for the 911 call tape meeting; and the infamous “Dee Dee” interview of 3/19/12.

Democrats Admit The Obvious – They Used The Newtown Victims and Never Warned Them How/Why…

Washington DC (Ammoland.com) —  In the final push toward the Senate gun control vote on April 17 2013, Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT) admitted Democrats were flying Newtown families into DC to break a Republican filibuster–he also admitted that those families did not know they were going to be used for that purpose until the plane carrying them was already in the air.

The families thought they were coming to DC to oppose “high capacity” magazines.  But according to The New York Times, once the families were in the air aboard Air Force One, Murphy let them know they would used “to get a vote on a vote.”

Here’s how Murphy put it: (more…)