Angela Corey Fires Ben Kruidbos – The "Whistleblower" in The Trayvon Phone Data Cover-up in The Zimmerman Case (We also Outline The Cover-up)

Another intended victim to cover the fraud in the backstory of the Zimmerman Trial.

Ben Kruidbos, an IT worker from the state attorney's office, testifies during a hearing in the George Zimmerman case in Sanford on June 6.  Associated PressJacksonville FL – State Attorney Angela Corey fired her office’s information technology director Friday after he testified last month about being concerned prosecutors did not turn over information to George Zimmerman’s defense team in the shooting death of Trayvon Martin.
On the same day attorneys finished their closing arguments in that nationally watched trial, a state attorney investigator went to Ben Kruidbos’ home about 7:30 a.m. to hand-deliver a letter stating Kruidbos “can never again be trusted to step foot in this office.”
The letter contended Kruibos did a poor job overseeing the information technology department, violated public records law for retaining documents, and noted he was questioned in March when the office was trying to determine who had leaked personnel information obtained through a computer breach.
In an interview Friday, Kruidbos denied the allegations in the letter, which was written by Cheryl Peek, the managing director of the State Attorney’s Office. (more…)

The Violent Nature of The Trayvon Martin Family and Attorneys (The Scheme Team)

As we write there is a specific and coordinated effort to distance the Trayvon Martin family and narrative from the violence that may take place after the Trial Verdict is delivered. However, we have a fully researched library of their lies and obfuscations. Here are collected reposts from July    and    November last year in that regard:

The gig is up – The scheme is exposed – Their entire false story is coming apart at the seams schemes. – But they continue to lie to the bitter end – That is the story of the Trayvon Martin Family and Family Attorneys (Crump, Jackson, Parks et al). All they know is lying – They have invested themselves so much in the false story they cannot even cognitively tell the difference between their lies and the Truth. Unfortunately, the same holds true for their simple-minded, sheeple supporters.
Consider – Their Latest Claim: “they did not align with the Black Panthers”.

Whoopsie – Um, well lets take a look at this, shall we: The capacity of the Trayvon Martin supporters and Scheme Team to boldly lie is quite staggering. The latest *cough* claim from the schemers is their protestations that the Martin Family and family Attorneys did not support the New Black Panther Party.

This claim of “non-support” or “non-alliance” with the Black Panthers is actually quite representative of how far they will go to sell a story of fabrications, falsehoods and lies. It does not take our site to diminish their credibility, and expose their LIES – it just takes their own lying words and your eyes to bear witness. (more…)

Judge Debra Nelson – A Lifelong Democrat

Gee ya think? Every single behavior and personality trait of Debra Nelson screams Progressive Democrat –  Put this in the ‘water is wet’ column…..

(Via TSG) Years before they would endure a televised pummeling in the Florida courtroom of Judge Debra Nelson, the two lawyers representing accused murderer George Zimmerman actually donated money to the prickly jurist’s first election campaign, records show.
In 1999, Republican Governor Jeb Bush appointed Nelson, a lifelong Democrat, to fill a vacancy in the 18th Judicial Circuit (covering Seminole and Brevard counties). When Nelson ran the following year for a full six-year term, she donated 85 percent of her campaign’s $151,000 war chest. (read more)

Thread 4 – Day 24 (Week #5) Zimmerman Trial – Jury Instructions

Judge Nelson Gives Jury Instructions
Judge Nelson 4
Today, July 12th, is DAY #24 (of 5th week) State of Florida V. George Zimmerman case.
Yesterday the prosecution provide closing arguments (Summary HERE), today the defense attorney, Mark O’Mara will present his closing argument. Then the prosecution rebuttal.

 

Four Live Stream Links: (more…)

Thread 2 – Day 24 (Week #5) Zimmerman Trial – Final Day

Today, July 12th, is DAY #24 (of 5th week) State of Florida V. George Zimmerman case.
Yesterday the prosecution provide closing arguments (Summary HERE), today the defense attorney, Mark O’Mara will present his closing argument. Then the prosecution rebuttal.
crump - O'Mara 2

“We will have to wait to see what the evidence provides, my client believes he is not guilty”…. [Mark O’Mara – April 2012, after arrest]
“My client feels he is not a racist”….. [Mark O’Mara – May 2012]
“I cannot speak to his honesty, but George Zimmerman has definitely damaged his credibility, we’ll have to wait and see if he can recover it”…. [Mark O’Mara – June 2012, 2nd Bond]
“My client said he thinks he did nothing wrong”….. [Mark O’Mara – July 2012]
“The Stand Your Ground law is an absurd statute”…. [Mark O’Mara – August 2012]
“I don’t know if it is illegal, but there should be a law, or legislation written, to stop this type of thing”….. [Mark O’Mara – September 2012]
“If it was not for my client, George Zimmerman, he (Crump) and I would be on the same side in this issue”…. [Mark O’Mara – October 2012]
“My client was arrested, he should have been arrested, and so there is no reason to debate civil rights in this trial… [Mark O’Mara – November 2012]
“He’s probably not guilty of murder”… [Mark O’Mara – July 2013]

(more…)

Subtle As a Brick Through a Window…

Andrew C McCarthy, notices there is a Sun In The Sky, as he reviews the Zimmerman Case.

CLICK HERE

However, McCarthy, like all legal minded intellectuals – never ask the “why” question.
zimmerman-trial-025-061713
Instead, he/they reconcile inside the box (donate to the building of a particle accelerator) – because the box defines the only concepts cognition can import (the comfort zone).

Thread 5 – Day 22 (Week #5) Zimmerman Trial – Witness Discussion Thread

Defense has rested – Prosecution Rebuttal Phase Begins

zimmerman-035-070913zimmerman-028-070813
Today, July 10th, is DAY #22 (of 5th week) State of Florida V. George Zimmerman case.
Yesterday began with a boom as defense expert witness, world renowned Dr Vincent Di Maio took to the stand to validate the forensic evidence supporting George Zimmerman’s version of the encounter with Trayvon Martin. However, the day ended with an even bigger THUNDERCLAP in an epic 10pm showdown as Don West took on both the State prosecutors and trial Judge Nelson after the jury was released. Ending with Judge Nelson, turning her back and walking out of court. Unreal. A great analysis of the events from yesterday is available HERE.
The late night argument, not by the State, but by Judge Nelson herself, regarding phone evidence authentication, is so weak and insufferably devoid of legal analysis it is absurd on its face. Then again, this is the same judge who said a few days ago, flippantly in open court, that evidence should be “shredded” (Dr. Bao notes) after use. D’oh (more…)

Thread 3 – Day 22 (Week #5) Zimmerman Trial – Witness Discussion Thread

zimmerman-035-070913zimmerman-028-070813
Today, July 10th, is DAY #22 (of 5th week) State of Florida V. George Zimmerman case.
Yesterday began with a boom as defense expert witness, world renowned Dr Vincent Di Maio took to the stand to validate the forensic evidence supporting George Zimmerman’s version of the encounter with Trayvon Martin. However, the day ended with an even bigger THUNDERCLAP in an epic 10pm showdown as Don West took on both the State prosecutors and trial Judge Nelson after the jury was released. Ending with Judge Nelson, turning her back and walking out of court. Unreal. A great analysis of the events from yesterday is available HERE.
The late night argument, not by the State, but by Judge Nelson herself, regarding phone evidence authentication, is so weak and insufferably devoid of legal analysis it is absurd on its face. Then again, this is the same judge who said a few days ago, flippantly in open court, that evidence should be “shredded” (Dr. Bao notes) after use. D’oh (more…)

Thread 2 – Day 22 (Week #5) Zimmerman Trial – Witness Discussion Thread

zimmerman-035-070913zimmerman-028-070813
Today, July 10th, is DAY #22 (of 5th week) State of Florida V. George Zimmerman case.
Yesterday began with a boom as defense expert witness, world renowned Dr Vincent Di Maio took to the stand to validate the forensic evidence supporting George Zimmerman’s version of the encounter with Trayvon Martin. However, the day ended with an even bigger THUNDERCLAP in an epic 10pm showdown as Don West took on both the State prosecutors and trial Judge Nelson after the jury was released. Ending with Judge Nelson, turning her back and walking out of court. Unreal. A great analysis of the events from yesterday is available HERE.
The late night argument, not by the State, but by Judge Nelson herself, regarding phone evidence authentication, is so weak and insufferably devoid of legal analysis it is absurd on its face. Then again, this is the same judge who said a few days ago, flippantly in open court, that evidence should be “shredded” (Dr. Bao notes) after use. D’oh (more…)

GO WEST ! The Video Which EVERYONE Should Watch !!


.
I’m debating other issues to share. But I can GUARANDAMNTEE YOU this trial is being put on a schedule by the Federal Dept of Justice. (Civil Rights Division Dept of Community Relations Service) If I prove it – we could lose this website.

Forward this video to 6:30 to really get the flavor of judicial bias which is NEEDED in order to accomplish a goal driven by outside the FLORIDA court influences.

updateThe argument, not by the State, but by Judge Nelson herself, regarding authentication, is so weak and insufferably devoid of legal analysis it is absurd on its face. Then again this is the same judge who said a few days ago, flippantly in open court, that evidence should be “shredded” (Dr. Bao notes).

Essentially she’s arguing that the phone records (texts and pics) cannot be authenticated to have originated by Trayvon Martin (despite two security codes) because anyone could have sent them. Whiskey*Tango*Foxtrot !! How can an email be used in a sex offender case? How can phone records be used in RICO cases? How can GPS evidence be used in Insurance Cases? Think about it.

You can’t argue that evidence cannot be admitted because someone else might have made the phone call; Someone else might have sent the email; Someone else accessed the website; Someone else might have driven the car etc.

Not to exclude evidence.

Sure it can be argued by the other side, as a counter point to the jury, but it can’t be a reasonable consideration for exclusion.

I’m evaluating how much we can reasonably share and cite without compromising people and structures which could be placed at risk.