
Some, well, actually eight Treepers want the research on Mark O’Mara to stop. They include: Mwsomerset, bill, M4, Labrat, Stephaufla, ejarra, Sandy, raiikun, and CleaningMyGun specifically. Four more apparently think it is a waste of time, they include: CiGuy, Chirality, Risefrombelow and Freedom Patriot.
So in essence that’s twelve people who think O’Mara is a solid attorney for George Zimmerman. There are probably a few more unknown. Fair enough.
Question: Imagine we are at war. We are on an aircraft carrier and we have been told we are headed to battle. What good does it do for us to muster in the Combat Ops planning room preparing our plans for an island assault strategy when the captain of the ship is steaming forward in a different direction?
All the conversational planning in the world ain’t gonna help us when we arrive at a divergent destination than we anticipated. That’s why it’s kinda important to know exactly who is steering the ship, where it is headed, and what to expect. No?
To borrow a thought from Gretchen: Some here are willingly blinded by the luminescence of a “very experienced and competent criminal trial lawyer” a constant refrain among those who defend Mark O’Mara.
Mark O’Mara’s manifold errors have been exposed and blogged about here, in detail I might add, yet do not seem to make an impression. One must not look at the growing mountain of FACTS, but must seek to fixate on one thing or another that bolsters a particular viewpoint, apparently. (more)
“a very experienced and competent criminal trial lawyer”? (more…)







