While assembling Part 4, to discuss the actual consequences from the short-sighted Obama/Clinton U.S. policy toward Libya in 2011, it became obvious that a key aspect is missing.   The “real” cause of the Arab Spring.

Having travelled in the area, against all prior research, and with hundreds of correspondence conversations, it just hit me like a ton of bricks that perhaps most people don’t know “why” it started.

As I began to assemble the reference points, and outline, this article appeared.    The substance contained inside that article further solidified the need to lay out the big picture before getting down into the micro-level consequences of Obama’s modern day Libyan folly.

The Westernized media version of what started the Arab Spring in Tunisia all revolve around some ubiquitous and vague talk of freedom, and a local market owner, Mohamed Bouazizi,  setting himself on fire in protest to oppressive government.

This is structurally and comprehensively flawed.   Actually, such an explanation is so brutally fraught with detachment – it’s quite alarming.

Imagine if a person gave origin to the Tea Party movement by saying “the Tea Party sprung up when President Obama was elected”, and left it at that.   It wouldn’t explain the origin of the Tea Party – it would only explain *timing*.    Accepting such an explanation would be silly, yet that’s exactly what it’s like to define the origin of the Arab Spring as above.

Suffice to say against the backdrop of the real cause – the origin of the Arab Spring protests would never be willingly or openly discussed by a globally left-leaning media.

In order to actually talk about the resulting chaos in Libya, a person really needs a fuller understanding of what led up to Mohamed Bouazizi self immolation on December 17th 2010.

It is only when a person fully understands that Europe, not Africa and not Arab countries, created the crisis – that a person can fully comprehend how the consequence of several key European decisions led to the Mid-East explosion.

Those decisions evolve around:   a.) the EU economy;  b.) the preceding mass immigration and failed “multi-cultural” ideological experiments of the left; and c.) the decisions the EU made to extract themselves from the economic consequences of mass uncontrolled migration.

So we’re going to delay Part – 4 of the Libya outline, in favor of going back a few years and set up just what Tunisia and Libya represented prior to 2010, the farmer’s market, and Mohamed Bouazizi’s extreme frustration.

/SD