Here’s the way you can help and the way we are going to approach this trial.

Unfortunately, because I’m in battle with Miami-Dade, the next few days look sketchy at best for me to review every moment of the trial. I’ve got to coordinate legal pressure on the Shadow Dwellers who are trying to keep a lid on the Trayvon Miami angle. The FOIAs (public records) will reveal the truth – but, as you know, they have a vested interest in waiting until after trial to release. Yes, the information is THAT explosive.

However, that said, after all the research, assembling the characters, and dozens of interviews with people specifically attached to the evidence and witnesses, I/we know hundreds of lies told by potential witnesses for the prosecution. Many of them are on record with claims, affidavits, and some sworn statements that are factually false.

They are not untruthful, they are not misstatements, they are lies.

There is a difference.

A lie is based on a false statement with a specific intention to mislead.

So here’s where EVERYONE comes in. As the trial witnesses are put on the stand by the prosecution, they are going to have to make decisions. Either A.) Lie under oath, or B.) Tell the truth and be shown to have given conflicting accounts.

We know with specific certainty some of them, if called, will have to continue their previous lies. If they don’t, it will be easy to reflect back on their prior statement/claim and call them out in front of the jury.

However, we don’t know if the defense knows enough about the minute’ to spot the lie when it is claimed.

So we will crowd source the witnesses as they take the stand.  {sidebar category “Zim Trial Witness Deconstruction}

We’ll have a general trial discussion post and a live feed post running simultaneously (As we did for the jury selection phase). However, if you spot a witness “lie” (divergence from prior claim) immediately point it out and we’ll crowd source quickly to give the defense the citations to cross examine and point out the disparity. Depending on who the witness is, and the length of testimony, and the time of day, we will throw up a deconstruction post focusing on that witness only.   If there are more than one witness who lies, there will be multiple threads (one per).

You are going to have to think and act fast – because this will be “in real time”.

Some of the people who are potential witnesses, who we know have lied previously in their statements/claims made publically and to law enforcement are: Detective Serino, Detective Smith, Brandi Greene, Chad Greene, Stephen “Boobie” Martin, Witness #8 and surrounding family (whom I doubt will be called), Tracy Martin, Sybrina Fulton, Mary Cutcher and about 10 more people (cannot yet name) whom we researched, and then did interviews with peripheral contacts.

I would guess the State already knows the majority of the impeachable testimony that each *might* present. [But the state does not know what is also known in that regard]

Subsequently, I believe the entire State case will be based on a story without many witnesses, forensics, etc and a narrative of prosecution around their focus on George and not the “Trayvon Story”. The state knows the “Trayvon Story” is fraught with false claims, untruths, and flat out lies.

Easy Example: Tracy Martin telling FDLE under oath (sworn affidavit) that he drove Trayvon 1/2 way to Sanford.

The State cannot tell the story of the event around the narrative of Trayvon because it is a total farce.

Therefore they will have to try and tell the story of the event around George Zimmerman; Who he was/is, what his beliefs were/are, etc. The state will approach the case from their story around “George’s mindset” – But if they go into character issues – it opens up an entire new opportunity for the defense.

However, they are going to have to put some of their witnesses on the stand to outline their case. Those are the people whose testimony we need to key in on as it happens. I doubt there will be many.

This trial is going to be long on lecture and short on substance – just like BDLR’s prior presentation to potential jurists.

….. It was a dark and stormy night…. Indeed !