Any Democrat Presidential Candidate found to be in non-compliance with the party speech edict will find themselves subject to the enforcement mechanisms !

(Via The Hill) Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz has issued an edict that sells short the soul of the party of the people.

There will only be six presidential debates for Democrats in the 2016 cycle, and any candidate who participates in any others will be banned from the DNC debates. As recently as Wednesday, Wasserman Schultz, sounding like Vladimir Putin dictating to the Russian Politburo, declared that she will not budge on this.
Here is a proposal for Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley and other Democratic candidates for the nation’s highest office: You should join together to publicly state that if any respected organization wishes to hold additional debates, you will participate in defiance of the Putin-like commands from Washington.
What will happen if this showdown offer is extended is that media organizations and others will come forward with new debate proposals. Other Democratic candidates will accept. Wasserman Schultz will ban those candidates from the DNC debates. Hillary Clinton will be forced to choose between being the only candidate on stage in the DNC-sanctioned debates, which would make her and the DNC look ridiculous, or participating in the rogue debates, which she would almost certainly do.
There is a growing revolt among Democrats who believe that more debates, not fewer, serve the interests of the party. This revolt is being led by DNC Vice Chairmen Tulsi Gabbard and R.T. Rybak, and Democratic mega-donor and environmentalist Tom Steyer. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) also recently joined the chorus of Democrats calling for more debates.
The growing revolt from many liberals and Democrats reflects far larger and more profound issues for the nation and the Democratic Party.  (read more)