If you’ve been wondering why the progressive side of the political continuum have been a little soft on the terror group ISIS in Syria/Iran, you only need to look at what they do when ISIS takes control of a municipality.
A strong argument can be made that ISIS leaders are merely Mid-east variants of Bloomberg, Clinton and Obama type progressives.


• Nanny Statist Bloomberg wants laws to ban soda freedom to advance physical health; Nanny ISIS invokes strict non-alcohol laws to advance physical health.
• Nanny Statist Michelle Obama want laws to control school lunch menus for the health of the collective; Nanny ISIS invokes strict no-smoking laws for the health of the collective.
https://twitter.com/MsIntervention/statuses/477052551213613056
• Nanny Clinton wants laws to stop your consumption of salt; ISIS want’s Sharia law to stop you from consuming non-Halal foods.
.
• Progressives want 5 year olds to watch state sponsored sex ed in schools; ISIS want primary schoolers to watch Sharia executions in the public square.
.
• Progressive Moonbat Cher wants non-compliant conservatives whipped for not supporting her state; ISIS wants non-compliant infidels whipped for not supporting their state.
.
• Progressives want guns removed so that only the government has guns; ISIS wants guns removed so that only ISIS has guns.


If they could get beyond the whole gay pride issue, on the freedom continuum, the Dems and ISIS are really not that far apart ideologically.



